Nov 21, 2025 by admin

Last June, legal technology company Clio and legal marketing company Scorpion announced that they had formed a comprehensive strategic partnership aimed at giving law firms greater visibility into their marketing investments and outcomes, addressing what the companies described as a longstanding blind spot in how lawyers understand and optimize their client acquisition efforts.

The partnership designated Scorpion as Clio’s sole preferred marketing partner and Clio as Scorpion’s sole preferred software partner, creating bidirectional referral arrangements between the two companies. It also established product integration and joint innovation initiatives designed to close what Harsha Chandra Shekar, Clio’s vice president of business development, calls “a huge disconnect” between marketing expenditures and actual results.

This was the first time that Clio, known for its extensive network of vendor partnerships, has ever designated one as a “sole preferred” partner.

At the time of the announcement, I was not able to cover it, and I have not seen much coverage of it elsewhere. At the ClioCon conference in October, Clio CEO Jack Newton made no mention of it during his keynote speech describing the company’s recent product updates.

So this week, I sat down for an interview with Shekar and Kirby Oscar, senior vice president, partnerships and corporate development at Scorpion, to learn more about the partnership and what it means for both company’s customers.

Closing the Visibility Gap

They told me that the partnership is designed to address a core problem familiar to virtually every law firm: Lawyers invest heavily in marketing to generate leads, but lack clear insight into which marketing channels produce the best return on investment. The gap becomes particularly acute at the moment when marketing vendors hand off leads to law firms, creating what amounts to an information black hole.

“Oftentimes our customers really don’t have clear visibility into which part of their marketing investment netted out what results,” Shekar said.

While Clio Grow, Clio’s intake-management product, provides Clio customers with a variety of CRM tools, he said, “there is a whole world prior to that where lawyers are putting their hard-earned dollars into marketing investments, trying to drive leads that eventually convert to matters and bills and then payments.”

Scorpion’s Oscar described what he sees as the challenge from the marketing provider’s perspective. His company can execute sophisticated SEO campaigns and paid advertising, but traditionally loses visibility the moment a lead is generated.

This forces Scorpion to ask clients for lead disposition data manually at the end of each month, creating a 30-day lag in understanding campaign effectiveness.

“We’re asking this to a client at the end of the month, but we’ve been spending their money since the first,” Oscar said. “We’re coming into them 30 days later to start going back and saying, ‘Well, did we make good bets or not?’”

Building on Home Services Success

Even larger than Scorpion’s business in the legal sector is its business providing marketing for home services companies such as plumbers, electricians and landscapers. This partnership with Clio builds directly on Scorpion’s experience in that sector, where the company entered into a similar integration with ServiceTitan, the leading vertical SaaS platform in that space, three years ago.

That integration demonstrated that when marketing providers receive high-volume disposition data on leads, advertising channels perform better while reducing the manual work required to optimize campaigns, Oscar said.

“It proved that if we could get high volumes of disposition data on leads, that our advertising channels would perform substantially better,” Oscar said of the ServiceTitan partnership.

What enabled both partnerships, Oscar said, is Scorpion’s technology-first approach. Unlike most marketing agencies that rely on third-party tools, Scorpion has built proprietary systems, including its own advertising product, website CMS, and SEO tools. This technological infrastructure allows the company to ingest data from partners and make automated optimization decisions in real time.

“That’s really what’s enabled us to go into home services and do this is we have this technology layer across everything we do,” Oscar explained. “So the more data that we could put into it, the better decisions we could make.”

Beyond Basic Integration

While the partnership centers on technical integration between Clio Grow and Scorpion’s marketing platform, the two executives emphasized that the relationship extends beyond API connectivity. The companies have established regular collaboration between their respective product teams to jointly develop new features and identify enhancements needed in Clio’s Grow API.

“Integration is just table stakes,” Shekar said. “We are actually doing a lot of joint innovation. Our product teams often sit together and exchange notes on, okay, what is the ideal integration that we need to build? What are some of the new features that Clio needs to build in its Grow API? How do we inject AI on both sides in a way that is seamless?”

One area of active development focuses on solving a challenge unique to legal services. Unlike the transactional nature of home services, legal matters can take years to resolve and generate payment. This makes it impractical to wait for realized revenue before optimizing marketing campaigns. The solution involves identifying earlier disposition points in the intake and consultation process that serve as reliable proxies for case quality.

“What we’ve been building is what are the disposition points that give us with high confidence that this is the ideal case for the firm,” Oscar explained. “How do you give visibility to a firm much earlier in the intake and consultation process versus having to wait until there’s an actualized revenue and realized revenue from the case?”

The system they are developing passes signals back to advertising platforms like Google indicating that a lead resulted in a signed client, without sharing any information about the case itself or client details.

More Granular Data

The integration also aims to resolve common disputes about marketing ROI by providing more granular financial data. Scorpion needs visibility not just into which leads convert to signed clients, but also into what firms collect on matters, since billed amounts and collected amounts often differ significantly.

“There are times when Scorpion may say, ‘Hey, you billed this much for this matter and therefore here’s the ROI on your marketing,’” Shekar said. “And then the client may say, ‘Hey, I realized only 75% of it, so that’s how I calculate the ROI.’ So how do you bridge that disconnect?”

The answer requires detailed data fields and functionality in the Clio Grow API to track matter stages and actual payments, allowing Scorpion to reconcile these differences and align with how clients calculate marketing effectiveness.

Reciprocal Referrals

The partnership includes reciprocal referral arrangements designed to identify firms that could benefit from the integrated solution. On the Scorpion side, the company can identify Clio customers who need marketing help by analyzing intake scores and lead conversion rates through the integration.

“We see when they’re sent to voicemail,” Oscar said. “We see when – especially when we’re integrated – we can see when they’re not getting enough new leads to hit their revenue goals.” Scorpion can then recommend firms adopt Clio Grow to improve intake automation when conversion rates fall below expectations.

From Clio’s perspective, the company’s customer success team regularly advises law firms on technology solutions, creating natural opportunities to recommend Scorpion for marketing services. The companies also conduct joint events in various cities where firms can see the integrated solution in action.

The partnership specifically targets the approximately 1,100 Scorpion customers who lack intake or case management systems, as well as Clio’s substantial customer base that either has no marketing provider or works with agencies unable to provide the level of integration and visibility Scorpion offers.

However, there is no special pricing offered to customers of either company because of the partnership. So a Clio customer who hires Scorpion would pay the same as any other customer.

Unprecedented Exclusivity

For Clio, this partnership – and its designation of Scorpion as its sole preferred marketing partner – is unusual in its exclusivity. While Clio is known for its extensive partner ecosystem, this is the first instance, Shekar acknowledged, where the company has “leaned in so heavily on a single partner.”

The rationale stems from what Shekar described as Scorpion’s dominant position in legal marketing technology.

“There’s also a very unique situation where we have one player who’s really head-and-shoulders about the competition when it comes to the level of technology sophistication as well as the sheer presence in the market,” Shekar said.

Even before the partnership, the companies already shared more than 500 mutual customers, providing an immediate base for an integrated offering. Shekar said that feedback from these shared customers has been “overwhelmingly positive,” with firms reporting capabilities they could not achieve with traditional marketing agencies.

One Seattle-based personal injury lawyer, according to Shekar, praised Scorpion’s ability to target prospects by specific sub-zip codes to reach ideal client profiles. “They’re like, this is not something that they’ve ever been able to do,” Shekar said.

The Problem of Overlapping Markets

Assuming this partnership is successful and results in many new customers for Scorpion, that raises a potential concern for law firms: How can a marketing firm based on ad words and SEO effectively represent multiple customers within the same geographic market and practice area?

I put that question to Oscar, who acknowledged it is one he is frequently asked.

His answer is that Scorpion offers multiple service tiers, ranging from basic website development to comprehensive “market leader” packages where a firm wants to spend aggressively to be the biggest presence in its market.

Scorpion may work with multiple firms in the same market, Oscar said, but it will set clear expectations about outcomes and differentiate by practice type where possible.

“We have to be really nuanced about practice type and we have to be nuanced about expectations,” he said. “We can’t go and sell three and say, ‘Hey, we’re going to put you all at the first spot,’ because that would be illogical.

“We’re very open about that and we try to be transparent with all our customers. So that’s how we would handle it and we would do that on a practice type by practice type basis.”

Proprietary CMS

Another common criticism I have heard of Scorpion concerns its proprietary content management system, which limits firms’ ability to easily migrate websites to other platforms.

“Scorpion’s proprietary system means a) you can’t work on your own site b) you can’t transfer your own site to another vendor c) if Scorpion’s code base doesn’t support what you need, you are shit out of luck,” wrote legal marketer Conrad Saam last year after Scorpion acquired the legal marketing firm Get Noticed Get Found.

In our interview, Oscar defended Scorpion’s proprietary platform as essential to the company’s value proposition, noting that the closed ecosystem enables the attribution tracking and integrated chat functionality that clients value.

“You either have to have a kind of closed CMS ecosystem or you have to open that up,” he said. “…We think it gives major benefits to our customers, and our customers seem to agree with that.”

He disputed the contention that customers cannot transfer their sites to other vendors. “We’ll package it up and we’ll give it to you, and you can go to a WordPress shop, they’ll take our files, they’ll build the site.

“We don’t own their site, we don’t own their domain, we don’t own any of those components,” Oscar said. “We do own the software that it sits on.”

Scorpion does not charge customers up front to build their websites, so if they want to leave, they must pay the remainder of their contract to pay for the work Scorpion did. “If you want to end your agreement, you’ve got to pay,” Oscar said.

The SEO Evolution

In response to my question about how gen AI search tools might disrupt traditional SEO, Oscar pushed back against any suggestion that SEO is becoming obsolete. He argued that optimization for AI-powered search tools still fundamentally relies on SEO principles, just applied differently.

“I don’t think SEO is dead in any capacity,” Oscar said. “Most optimization across all of the agentic tools is still SEO. It’s just different types of content creation and it’s being used in different ways.”

The key shifts involve greater emphasis on video content, citation building and encouraging clients to request reviews that include specific details about service types and attributes.

Since AI tools provide “thoughts and feelings” rather than just search results, reputation signals and detailed review content become increasingly important for showing up in AI recommendations.

Scorpion now requires video content for all but its smallest packages, reflecting the company’s assessment of how search is evolving.

An Acquisition in the Offing?

Looking beyond their immediate partnership, both executives expressed the belief that the innovations they are developing will benefit the broader legal tech ecosystem. As Clio enhances its Grow API to support the Scorpion integration, those capabilities become available to other marketing providers and technology partners.

“A lot of these innovations are going to benefit not just Scorpion, but all the digital marketing agencies and therefore all of the law firms,” Shekar said. “What we’re doing is really like putting two best-in-class teams together to create outcomes that will benefit the entire industry.”

With these two companies now having entered into this preferred partnership, and with Clio having just closed another $500 million in financing and a $350 million debt facility, I asked Shekar and Oscar whether this partnership is a prelude to an acquisition.

Without ever explicitly answering yes or no, Oscar said Scorpion likes the path it has gone down first with ServiceTitan for its home services business and now with Clio for its legal business.

“Services and vertical SaaS are very different business types, and we see ourselves as a way for vertical SaaS companies to play in this space without having to build out a service organization for marketing and a different revenue profile too.

“… Our home service business last month actually just surpassed our legal business,” Oscar continued. “So my goal for next year is to get the Clio relationship with Scorpion to where we’ll get the legal business back into first place.”